SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 434

H.N.TILHARI
ALLABAKSH – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMED HUSSAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajit Gunjal, J.S.GUNJAL, PARAMESHWARA N.HEGDE, S.M.KAPOOR

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs second appeal from the judgment and decree dated 7-8-1983, delivered by the civil judge, gulbarga, in regular appeal (civil) No. 216 of 1981, which had also been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant, challenging the judgment and decree dated 15-9-1981, delivered by the munsiff, chittapur, in original suit i. e. , o. s. No. 74 of 1978, dismissing the plaintiffs first civil (regular) appeal affirming the judgment and decree of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs claim in the suit for redemption of mortgage.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are that the plaintiff appellant filed the suit for redemption of the suit property alleging that his father had mortgaged the property in suit with the 1st defendant-respondent 1, with possession for a mortgage consideration i. e. , loan amount of Rs. 500/-, sometimes in the year 1960, after executing a deed, on a stamp paper with a condition that whenever mortgage amount is paid, the 1st defendant-respondent 1, is to deliver the vacant possession of the suit property, as per terms of mortgage deed. It was provided that defendant 1, would pay the municipal taxes and enjoy the property and there w

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top