SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 72

STATE – Appellant
Versus
AJJIKUTTIRA POOVAIAH – Respondent


( 1 ) THE State is aggrieved by the judgement of the Sessions Judge, Kodagu District, Madikeri acquitting the accused persons of the charges u/s 307 r/w 34 IPC and Section 3 and 27 of the Indian Arms Act.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case was that on 31-5-1987 at about 4 p. m. when PW-1 was going in Nagarahole Forest for bringing firewood, the two accused persons shared common intention of murdering PW-1 Javara and that in pursuance of that common intention A-1 fired a shot from M. O. 1-gun causing grievous injury to PW-1 and that A-1 had no license to possess the gun.

( 3 ) THE prosecution examined 10 witnesses in support of its case. The gist of the prosecution case as disclosed in the evidence is as hereunder :on 31-5-1987 at about 4 p. m. PW-1 went inside Nagarahole forest to bring firewood. A-1 and A-2 were in the forest and A-1 who was armed with a gun asked PW-1 to stop. But PW-1 started running. Then A-1 fired from the gun. PW-1 sustained injuries on his back and other parts of the body. PW-1 ran to his house and informed his brother PW-2 Dass who took him to PW-3 K. S. Uthappa, Mandal Pradhan. PW-3 took PW-1 to the police station in a car. The PSI, PW-7 recorded the complaint of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top