SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 204

M.M.MIRDHE
MALLANA GOUDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


M. M. MIRDHE, J.

( 1 ) LA. No. II is filed by the applicants seeking to come on record as the L. Rs. of the petitioner who died on 2-12-1995 on the basis of a registered will dated 15-12-1992 in favour of the applicants. Another LA. dated 15-2-1996 is filed by the applicants who claim to be the sons of Rudragowda Patil and who want to come on record as Class I heirs of deceased Mallanagouda.

( 2 ) I have heard the Counsel for the applicants, Counsel for respondent 3 and the Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 and perused the records of the case.

( 3 ) PETITIONER Mallanagouda filed Form No. 7 claiming occupancy rights in the lands in question. The Tribunal rejected his claim and dismissed his Form No. 7. The petitioner filed this writ petition praying to quash that order of the Land Tribunal. It is not disputed that petitioner Mallanagouda died on 2-12-1995. LA. No. II is filed by the applicants who claim to be the sons of one Fakiragouda Patil, who was the brother of mallanagouda. In the LA. , it is stated by them that by virtue of a will executed by the petitioner on 14-12-1992 in their favour, they are entitled to come on record. The Will is not admitted by the other side.





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top