SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 316

H.N.NARAYAN
RESIDENTS OF MICO LAYOUT, II STAGE, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
J. S. S. MAHAVIDYA PEETHA, MYSORE – Respondent


H. N. NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS are the residents of mico colony which was formed by the mico employees' house building co-operative society limited, Bangalore. The challenge in this writ petition is the allotment of c. a. 2 site to the 1st respondent by the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent has sanctioned a layout plan viz. , mico layout, submitted by the society as per annexure-b. The said society formed the layout as required under Bangalore development authority act and rules and regulations and also according to comprehensive development plan (c. d. p. ). It is their case that the society has earmarked 2 c. a. sites for play ground for the use of the residents of the layout which are identified as c. a. 2 and c. a. 3 in the sanction plan. These 2 c. a. sites constitute 166900 sq. Ft. Which is about 12. 83% of the total land of 29 acres and 34 guntas or 1300266 sq. Ft. It is their specific case that a major portion of c. a. 2 is earmarked as play ground for the use of the residents of the layout and the portion abutting the 15th main road is for college as per the sanctioned plan. It is their further case that the 2nd respondent has allotted the entire c. a. 2 site measurin
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top