SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 367

JAYAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


K. H. N. KURANGA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is listed for admission today. The learned Government Pleader had taken notice for the respondents. Though the name of the State is not shown in the cause-list, the learned Government Pleader who had received the copy of the petition on 1-7-1996 appears for the respondent.

( 2 ) HEARD both the sides. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court government Pleader, the petition is taken up for final disposal.

( 3 ) THE petitioner has in this petition prayed for setting aside the order dated 19-6-1996 passed by the learned IV Additional city Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCCH No. 21) in S. C. No. 307 of 1992.

( 4 ) THE police filed the charge-sheet against the accused for the commission of the offences punishable under Section 307, 302 and 201, I. P. C. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions and now the case is pending on the file of the IV Additional City civil Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore (CCCH No. 21 ). When the case was posted on 19-6-1996 P. W. 1 who was the injured and c. W. 1 in the charge-sheet was examined by the prosecution. At that stage, an application under Section 231 (2), Cr









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top