SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 362

H.N.NARAYAN
C. N. RANGANATH – Appellant
Versus
M. R. THYAGARAJA – Respondent


H. N. NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) AGREEMENT of sale dated 10-6-1991 alleging that the defendant is the owner in possession of the suit house, and agreed to sell the same for consideration of Rs. 1,40,000/- and executed the deed of agreement dated 10-6-1991 Ex. P-1. Defendant received an advance of Rs. 30,000/- on the date of agreement agreeing to receiver the balance of consideration within three months from the date of agreement and to execute the sale deed. But the defendant failed to execute the sale deed in spite of repeated requests. The defendant according to plaintiff failed to perform his part of the contract even though the plaintiff was always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract. Hence the suit for specific performance.

( 2 ) DEFENDANT has not disputed execution of the agreement Ex. P-1 and the advance of Rs. 30,000/ -. He has also not disputed that he had agreed to receive the balance of Rs. 1,01,000/- within three months from the date of the said agreement, and to execute the sale deed. But his contention is that the plaintiff was never willing and ready to perform his part of the contract as he had no money. According to him plaintiff has failed to report his re















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top