SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 457

MALAYAIAH – Appellant
Versus
G. S. VASANTHA LAKSHMI – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision is by the husband questioning the legality and correctness of the order of' the District and Sessions Judge, Mandya dated August 7, 1993 in Cr. R. P. No. 66 (A)/91 arising out of the order dated April 1, 1991 in C. Mis, No. 75/88 on the file of the learned Magistrate, Srirangapatna granting maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month to each one of three respondents with further direction that the amount awarded in favour of 1st respondent to be paid from April 1, 1991. Learned Magistrate had refused maintenance to the 1st respondent and had ordered maintenance at the rate of Rs. 250/- each for respondents 2 and 3.

( 2 ) I would refer to the parties hereinafter as they are arrayed in the original petition before the learned Magistrate.

( 3 ) PETITIONERS made an application under Sec. 125 of Cr. P. C. against the respondent praying for atleast a sum of Rs. 1500/- per month for their maintenance. It is undisputed that 1st petitioner G. S. Vasanthalakshmi and the respondent Malayaiah belonging to different communities married on April 12, 1981 and their marriage came to be registered in the office of the Registrar of Marriages at Mysore on April 25, 1981. They continued to










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top