SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 482

S.RAJENDRA BABU, R.P.SETHI
K. B. NAGENDRA – Appellant
Versus
S. P. RAGHUNATH – Respondent


R. P. SETHI, CJ.

( 1 ) PROMOTION of the appellant as chief manager vide order dated 4-7-1995 was challenged in the writ petition filed by Sri s. p. raghunath-respondent, mainly on the grounds of violation of the service Rule applicable, ignoring his seniority and non-consideration of the case. The writ petition was allowed by quashing the impugned order giving the employer-corporation liberty to make fresh order of promotion in accordance with law and keeping in view the observations made in the said judgment. It is submitted that the order of the learned single judge being contrary to the relevant rules was liable to be set aside. It is contended that the learned single judge was not right in holding that the committee which approved promotion was not properly constituted. It is further submitted that the learned single judge did not properly appreciate the effect of Rule 13 of the Karnataka state small industries development corporation limited (cadre and recruitment) rules (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules' ). The promotions to the post of chief manager could not be made only on the basis of the seniority as it has stated to have been presumed by the learned single judge.

(



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top