V. P. MOHAN KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) WHEN this revision petition came up for admission Sri B. B. Bajentri, learned Advocate, took notice on behalf of the respondent. It was agreed that the civil revision petition itself can be disposed off.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein was working as a Second Division Clerk in the petitioner-institution. On certain alleged charge of misappropriation disciplinary proceedings were initiated and an enquiry was conducted by the Principal of Seshadripuram evening Law College. After enquiry the worker was found guilty. On the basis of the enquiry report his services were terminated. He filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority constituted under Section 8 of the Karnataka Private educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 (for short 'the Act' ). Several contentions were urged on the merits of the case as well. The Appellate Authority was mainly impressed by the circumstances that there were two sets of charges framed against the worker; one by the Committee and the other by the enquiry Officer; that the termination order had not been approved by the Director of Collegiate Education; that the president of the Committee had no power to impose the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document