SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 83

H.N.NARAYAN
MOHAMED ZIAULLA – Appellant
Versus
SORGRA BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates:
S.A.Mujeeb, SREEVATSA ASSOCIATES

H. N. NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code is directed against the order of the Additional City Civil Judge, bangalore allowing LA. 20 filed by the first defendant for permission to cross-examine defendant 2 who is examined as d. W. 1.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF has filed a suit for specific performance of agreement of sale alleging that the defendants who are sister and brother have executed the same. In the defence filed by defendant 2, it is contended that he is the general power of attorney holder of defendant 1 which fact is disputed by the first defendant. Defendant 1 has denied the claim of the plaintiff that she has also joined hands with defendant 2 in execution of agreement of sale consideration.

( 3 ) AFTER the evidence of the plaintiff was closed, defendant 1 filed an application praying permission to examine herself after the evidence of defendant 2. The Trial Court has permitted her to do so. Thereafter, defendant 2 was examined as D. W. 1 and cross-examined by the plaintiff. At that stage, defendant 1 prayed for permission to cross-examine D. W. 1 on the grounds that there is conflict of interest in the defence of the defendant and that d











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top