M.P.CHINNAPPA
CHANDRA POOJARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that one K. Puttaswamy, Commercial Tax Officer, lodged a complaint with the respondent-police on 2-3-96 at about 8. 45 p. m. on the complaint received through tappal alleging that on 28-12-95 at about 12 noon appointment was fixed by the complainant to produce the accounts for the year 1992-93. The Group 'd' worker was directed to hold the parties at the door since the complainant was engaged in signing cheques and challans. Meanwhile the petitioner rushed to the chamber by pushing away the Group 'd' employee and abused the complainant saying " " and threatened that no one should give any evidence regarding the incident. If any evidence is given, they will face consequences. On the basis of this report the police registered a case in Cr. No. 80/96 and after completing the inv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.