SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 419

H.N.TILHARI
AMMANI VERGHESE – Appellant
Versus
RAMA MUGERA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.KESHAVA BHAT, SHANTHA KUMAR V.MAHALE

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Order dated 9th june, 1992, passed by the deputy commissioner, dakshina kannada, mangalore, dismissing the petitioner's appeal and affirming the Order dated 17-5-1985, passed by the assistant commissioner in proceedings under Section 5 of ACT 2 of 1979, as well as Order dated 20th august, 1984, that was originally passed in the earlier proceedings.

( 2 ) FACTS of the case in the nutshell are that the petitioner is a purchaser of granted land from the grantee. The land was granted in favour of deyyu mogera on 25-12-1937, under depressed class assignment rules. The land that had been granted had been 0. 45 acre in sy. No. 171/4 and the grantee had also been granted 0. 10 acre in sy. No. 171/15 of the same village. The alienation of the property that is 0. 10 acre was made in favour of the petitioner by Sri rama mogera, son of the original grantee, to a person who did not belong to scheduled caste. The authorities allowed the application under Section 5 (1), read with Section 4 of the ACT and held the transfer to be in breach of non-alienation condition of original grant and therefore to be null and void and or









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top