SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 398

H.N.TILHARI
B. N. YAGATAPPA – Appellant
Versus
GADLAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
C.B.MINAJAGI, S.V.Prakash, SHANTHA KUMAR V.MAHALE

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner-sri s. v. prakash and Sri c. b. minajagi for respondents 1 to 7 and Smt. Shanthakumari learned government pleader for respondents 8 and 9. These petitions raise common question of law in the contest of common facts so are being disposed off by common order.

( 2 ) BY these petition, the petitioners have sought the issuance of writ of certiorari and the quashing of the order passed by the assistant commissioner, shimoga dated 16-8-1995, in case No. Sc/st 68 of 1985-86, on 9-6-1997, copy of which is Annexure-B to the writ petition, as well as quashing of the order passed by the deputy commissioner, shimoga in sc/st case No. 68 of 1985-86, on 9-6-1997, and also the order of the assistant commissioner, shimoga sub-division, shimoga in case nos. Ptcl. Cr. 272 of 1979-80, 275 (b) of 1979-80, 276 of 1979-80, 277 of 1979-80, 278 of 1979-80, 284 of 1979-80 and 285 of 1979-80.

( 3 ) THE facts of the case in brief are that the land in question involved in these cases were granted under durkasth payment system, by an order dated 21-10-1962. The survey number involved in these cases, as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the writ petition











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top