SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 388

G.PATRI BASAVANA GOUD
KASIM ALI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BANGALORE DIVISION, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
K.SUBBA RAO, L.GOVIND RAJ

G. PATRI BASAVANA GOUD, J.

( 1 ) ON 23-7-1977, when the petitioner was Working as Traffic Controller in the 1st Respondent-K. S. R. T. C. at kolar bus stand, he was alleged to be guilty of misconduct in failing to observe the ticket numbers in the ticket tray properly, that 9 tickets of rs. 1-05 denomination were found intact and in un-punched condition. He was, therefore, served with an article of charge in that regard to which he submitted a reply denying the charge. the disciplinary authority, however, passed an order holding the petitioner guilty of the charge of misconduct levelled against him. He then proceeded to impose a penalty of reducing the petitioner's pay by one incremental stage permanently. petitioner's appeal to the divisional manager came to be dismissed. He has approached this court under article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of the order of the disciplinary authority at Annexure-B and that of the appellate authority at Annexure-D.

( 2 ) REGULATION 18 of the Karnataka state road transport corporation servants (conduct and discipline) regulations, 1971 ('regulations' for short) lists minor penalties and major penalties. Withholding of increments is a min






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top