SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 374

M.P.CHINNAPPA
B. PUSHPALATHA – Appellant
Versus
K. MOHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
A.H.BHAGAVAN, Shams A.Pathan

M. P. CHINNAPPA, J.

( 1 ) AN important question is raised in this petition viz. , that the complaint is not maintainable on the ground that the cheque was issued on 15-10-92 with the date on the cheque as 22-3-93. The said cheque was presented on 24-4-93. The date has to be computed from the date of issuance of cheque and not the date mentioned in the cheque itself. On that ground, the counsel contended that the cheque was presented beyond 6 months from the date of issuance. Hence, the complaint is liable to be dismissed.

( 2 ) REPELLING this argument, the learned counsel for the respondent however submitted that the cheque in question was post-dated and the same was presentable before the bank for encashment only on 22-3-1993 or on subsequent date. Therefore, the cheque presented was within time.

( 3 ) IT is an admitted fact that the respondent has lodged a complaint under Section 200, cr. P. c. before the vii additional c. m. m. , Bangalore, which was registered as c. c. No. 17061 of 1993. In the complaint it is alleged that the petitioner had borrowed a sum of Rs. 45,000/- to run a hotel business. To discharge the said liability the petitioner had issued a post-dated cheque for a






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top