SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 531

H.N.TILHARI
SYED GAFAR – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DIVISION, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
BHARATI NAGESH, E.G.SRIHARAN, Naleena Loganathan

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against the order dated may 20, 1997, passed by the divisional commissioner, Bangalore in No. Gin. Appeal 2 of 1997-98, and the petitioner has sought the quashing of that order.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case as appears from the record are that earlier that is in 1991, in pursuance of proceedings in arbitration no. 1 of 1971, finally registered sale deed dated 29-8-1991, was executed in favour of respondent no. 3 by the other partners and the application for grant of permit was made by the petitioner and the respondent alleges to have made the application for permit, while the fact that is respondents having moved the application, is denied by the petitioner. This is not very material fact at this juncture. The main application for re-grant of licence made by the petitioner has not been disposed of till today, instead the licensing authority granted a temporary permit that is temporary licence in favour of the present petitioner vide, order dated 12-4-1997, Annexure-B to the writ petition for the period from 15th of may, 1997 to 15th of august, 1997.

( 3 ) HAVING felt aggrieved from the order of the licensing authority granting temporar

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top