B.S.SREENIVASA RAO
TUKARAM – Appellant
Versus
SAMBHAJI – Respondent
( 1 ) R. S. A. No. 586 of 1994 has been filed by defendant 1 and R. S. A. No. 1030 of 1994 has been filed by defendants 2 to 5 against the judgment and decree passed in RA. No. 27 of 1987 by the First Additional District judge, Belgaum allowing cross-objections of the plaintiff and dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants confirming the judgment and decree dated 4-4-1987 passed in O. S. No. 271 of 1984 by the Principal Civil judge, Belgaum and thus decreeing the suit of the plaintiff in entirety.
( 2 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the appellants in both the appeals and respondent I/plaintiff.
( 3 ) FOR convenience sake, appellant in R. S. A. No. 586 of 1994 is referred to as defendant 1 and the appellants in R. S. A. No. 1030 of 1994 are referred to as defendants 2 to 5. Respondent 1 as the plaintiff, respondents 2 to 10 as Defendants 7 to 15, respondents 11 to 15 as defendants 2 to 6.
( 4 ) THE facts of the case, briefly, stated are as follows: One Huvappa nesarkar was the original propositus who died on 19-9-1969, leaving behind him his sons, defendant 1, Tukaram, defendant 7, Shivaji, defendant 8, Vasant, defendant 9, Appanna and plaintiff-Sambhaji.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.