SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 638

MOHAMED ANWAR
VALI SIDDAPPA AND OTHERS, ETC. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
MALIKARJUN S.MYLAR, R.B.DESHPANDE, S.S.Guttal

( 1 ) HEARD.

( 2 ) THE petitioners in both these petitions are the accused in C. C. 554/94 facing trial for Section 295-A, I. P. C. before the learned Magistrate, on being charge-sheeted by the Thambrahalli P. S. Crime No. 16/92, H. B. Halli Taluk of Bellary District.

( 3 ) CERTIFIED copy of the order sheet in said C. C. 554/94 filed along with the petition discloses that the said crime No. 1 6/92 was booked by the police under S. 295-A against these petitioners on complaint dated 22-2-1992 of CW 1 Rama Naik. On Investigation of the crime, the charge-sheet was laid for the said offence by the Investigating Officer ('i. O. ' for short) on 30-7-1994, on the basis of the sanction under S. 196, Cr. P. C. purported to have been granted by the competent authority for prosecution of the petitioners accused. The criminal prosecution of the accused in C. C. No. 554 of 1994 stands challenged by them in this revision on the ground that obtaining of requisite sanction under S. 196, Cr. P. C. for the offence under S. 295-A, I. P. C. from the State Government is a condition precedent, and that the so-called sanction that was obtained by the I. O. and was filed along with the charge-sheet in the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top