MOHAMED ANWAR
VALI SIDDAPPA AND OTHERS, ETC. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioners in both these petitions are the accused in C. C. 554/94 facing trial for Section 295-A, I. P. C. before the learned Magistrate, on being charge-sheeted by the Thambrahalli P. S. Crime No. 16/92, H. B. Halli Taluk of Bellary District.
( 3 ) CERTIFIED copy of the order sheet in said C. C. 554/94 filed along with the petition discloses that the said crime No. 1 6/92 was booked by the police under S. 295-A against these petitioners on complaint dated 22-2-1992 of CW 1 Rama Naik. On Investigation of the crime, the charge-sheet was laid for the said offence by the Investigating Officer ('i. O. ' for short) on 30-7-1994, on the basis of the sanction under S. 196, Cr. P. C. purported to have been granted by the competent authority for prosecution of the petitioners accused. The criminal prosecution of the accused in C. C. No. 554 of 1994 stands challenged by them in this revision on the ground that obtaining of requisite sanction under S. 196, Cr. P. C. for the offence under S. 295-A, I. P. C. from the State Government is a condition precedent, and that the so-called sanction that was obtained by the I. O. and was filed along with the charge-sheet in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.