SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 53

T.S.THAKUR
S. S. ANAND – Appellant
Versus
MANAGEMENT OF MAHATMA GANDHI VIDYA PEETA (REGD. ), BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.PRABHAKAR, S.VASANTH KUMAR, SUBBA RAO

TIRATH S. THAKUR, J.

( 1 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in these writ petitions is whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of the pay scales admissible to employees holding equivalent posts in the Government Educational Institutions. The question arises against the following backdrop. The petitioners are working as non-teaching employees of the respondent-Society, who has among other Institutions established what is known as Dayanandasagar College of engineering at Bangalore. The College, it is not in dispute, is recognised by the Government of Karnataka and the All India council for Technical Education. It is affiliated to the Bangalore university under the Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976.

( 2 ) THE grievance of the petitioners is that they have been working as permanent non-teaching employees for more than 10 years in the aforementioned College against different posts such as Instructors, Programmers, Clerks, Mechanics, Helpers and attenders in various Departments of Engineering. They were appointed initially on a consolidated salary ranging from Rs. 150/- to Rs. 1500/- depending upon the post held by them, which payment was in no way commensu















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top