SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 100

Karnataka High Court
Fellix-Joannas - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Decided On : 02-18-98
CRIMINAL APPEAL : 238 of 1995

Advocates:
Hashmath Pasha, S.S.KOTI

Headnote:Indian Evidence Act, 1872-Section 27-Credibility of disclosure statement-confessional statement about disclosure of shoe lace used in strangulation of deceased by accused did not bear signature of accused who made the said statement-such statement held unreliable and can not be used as it had no evidentiary value.

       

( 1 ) THE appellant-accused has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 25-2-1995 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shimoga in S. C. No. 33/1993 convicting the appellant-accused of the offence under S. 302, I. P. C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case, briefly is, as follows :- Marry alias Asha (deceased) was the younger sister of Francis Rodrigues (P. W. 2) of Sagar. Her father had expired and the family depended upon Francis Rodrigues, being the eldest son of the family. He performed the marriage of the deceased with the accused-Fellix-Joannas on 16-10-1991. The accused started telling the deceased that he wanted to search for a job abroad. In that regard the deceased and accused visited Bombay, some times in the early part of 1992. After coming back from Bombay, the accused asked the deceased to arrange through her brother Rs. 10,000/- for visa and passport. Marry was feeling very delicate to ask her brother Francis. However, she visited Sagar in the month of May, 1992. Marry requested Shamala, her close friend to give the money. Shamala gave Rs. 10,000/- to Marry in the month of July, 1992. The same amount was given by Marry to the accused. The accused went to Bombay and returned back by saying that he was cheated by an agent. Marry was shocked. In the month of November, 1992 Shamala visited Shimoga and asked the deceased Marry to return the amount of Rs. 10,000/- because Shamala wanted to obtain a fair price shop licence. Marry assured her that she will make some arrangement in December, 1992. As demands of Shamala were increasing Marry asked her younger sister Leena Rodrigues, who was employed as a nurse in Manipal Hospital to arrange for money. Marry visited Sagar and met Shamala and paid her Rs. 3,000/- on 29-12-1992. For the balance amount, Marry requested for time. Whenever Marry demanded money the accused become violent and Marry suffered harassment at the hands of the accused. On 2-2-1993 Shamala met Marry in Shimoga, after attending interview in the Tahsildar Office. Shamala demanded the balance amount of Rs. 7,000/- from Marry. Marry requested time till 6th or 7th of February. Shamala was the last person, who met Marry just three days prior to her death.

( 3 ) ON 6-2-1993 at 9. 00 a. m. Francis received a telegram regarding the death of Marry. He rushed to Shimoga with his family members and noticed the dead body of Marry lying in the house of the accused. There was only one deep circular ligature mark around the neck. The body was lying in the centre room. Accused was present. But he did not give proper answer to the questions of Francis.

( 4 ) FRANCIS rushed to the police station and gave a complaint to the C. P. I. Linga Reddy P. W. 15. The complaint is at Ex. P-1. P. W. 15 visited the spot registered a case in Crime No. 34/93 for an offence under S. 302, I. P. C. and visited the spot and noticed the dead body. Inquest was conducted as per Ex. P-11. All the witnesses stated that relationship between accused and the deceased was strained. They also stated that accused has borrowed Rs. 10,000/- from the deceased and the deceased was asking for the amount and therefore there was quarrel in the family. Investigation revealed that the death of Marry occurred in the night of 5-2-1993 or early morning of 6-2-1993. Accused was arrested and he was interrogated by the Investigating Officer-P. W. 15. Accused gave a voluntary statement leading to recovery of shoes and one shoe lace. The voluntary statement given by the accused is marked as Ex. P-44, which led to the recovery of shoe-lace M. O. 1. The dead body was sent to post-mortem examination. The doctor at Mcc. Gann Hospital conducted autopsy. He was of the opinion that the death of Marry was due to manual strangulation using some material like rope. He opined that death was due to asphyxia resulting from strangulation. The post-mortem report is at Ex. P-7.

( 5 ) P. W. 1 is the doctor who was examined in C











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top