SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 91

P.VISHWANATHA SHETTY
AMEER KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.MAHESH, JAYANT PATTANASHETTI, K.GIRIDHAR, P.S.Manjunath, T.B.MRUTHUNJAYA

P. VISHWANATHA SHETTY, J.

( 1 ) SINCE the questions involved in these petitions are identical, all these petitions are taken up and heard together and disposd of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE petitioners, in these petitions, are the owners of various items of lands, which are sought to be acquired for the purpose of formation of a Truck Terminal at a place known as Kyathasandra on the National Highway near Tumkur Town.

( 3 ) IN these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the notification dated 26th of October, 1996 published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 30th of October, 1996, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-A to Writ Petitions Nos. 10603 and 10604/97, issued under Section 17 (1) of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), and the notification dated 1st of February, 1997 published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 20th of February, 1997, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-D to Writ Petitions Nos. 10603 and 10604/1997, issued under Section 19 (1) of the Act.

( 4 ) A few facts, which are not in dispute and which may be relevant for the disposal of these writ petitions, may be set out as hereunder : (A)


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top