SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 169

Karnataka High Court
Hambamma - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Decided On : 03-13-98
W.A. : 493 of 1993

Advocates:
A.S.MAHESH, K.Abhinav Anand, M.R.ACHARYA, S.V.JAGANATH, T.S.AMAR KUMAR, T.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, TARAKARAM

Headnote:Mysore Land Revenue Code, 1888-Section 233, Mysore Land Revenue Rues, 1960-Rule-433 J-grant of land-delegatee can not exceed his power-he has only to act within the power conferred on him-instantly, condition imposed by the Tahsildar which was not imposed by the Govt. cannot be sustained.

       

BHASKAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of Writ Appeals are filed asailing the orders of the learned single Judge. In all the appeals, the questions arise for consideration is the same.

( 2 ) THE brief facts are that certain lands were granted to different persons on the ground that they are cultivating Government lands as lessees on temporary lease, by virtue of Rule 43 (J) of the Mysore (now Karnataka) Land Revenue Rules of 1960. After the grant of permanent Saguvali Chits, they alienated the lands to third parties. In some of the cases they were further alienated. Thereafter the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 came into force. (The said Act will hereinafter be referred to as 'karnataka Act 2 of 1979' ). It came into force on 1-1-1979. Section 4 of the Act envisages that any transfer of granted land made either before or after the commencement of the Act, in contravention of the terms of the grant of such land or the law providing for such grant, shall be null and void and no right, title or interest in such land shall be conveyed nor be deemed ever to have conveyed by such transfer. Sub-section (2) provides that no person shall, after the commencement of this Act, transfer or acquire by transfer any granted land without the previous permission of the Government. Sub-section (3) envisages that the provision of sub-sections (1) and (2) shall apply also to the sale of any land in execution of a decree or order of a Civil Court or of any award or order of any other authority.

( 3 ) SECTION 5 of the Act empowers the Assistant Commissioner, where on application by any interested persons or on information given in writing by any person, or suo motu, after such enquiry, if he is satisfied that the transfer of any granted land is nulll and void under sub-section (1) of Section 4, may by order, take possession of such land after evicting the person affected giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard, he can restore the land to original allottee. Again an appeal is provided under Section 5-A to the Deputy Commissioner, having jurisdiction. Section 6 prohibits registration of such granted lands. Section 8 provides penalty of six months imprisonment or with fine, which may extend to Rs. 2,000/- or with both. Section 10 of the Act empowers the State to make Rules. Section 11 provides that the Act shall have effect of overriding the other laws. This is the the scheme of the Act. After the Act came into force, notices were issued to various transferees from the original grantees in these cases. The original authority passed orders, after conducting enquiry declaring that the transfers were null and void and directed restoration of possession to the original grantees. These orders were confirmed in appeals. Assailing the said orders, writ petitions were filed.

( 4 ) THE learned single Judge, who heard the matters, allowed some of the petitions quashing the impugned orders therein and some petitions were dismissed. Aggrieved by these orders, the present writ appeals are filed.

( 5 ) WHEN the appeals came up for hearing, the matter was referred to the Full Bench by the Division Bench, - vide reference order :"one of the important questions that arises for consideration in these writ appeals is as to whether an authority granting land under Rule 43-J of Mysore Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 1960 can impose any condition at the time of making grant that the grantee, shall not alienate the land for a period of 15 years when Rule 43-J do not provide for any such condition. A further question also arise on the effect of a condition imposed in the Saguvali chit by the Tahsildar that the grantee shall not alienate the land for a period of 15 years when such condition was not imposed by the order of the Authority making the grant. 2. Section 4 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ac


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top