SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 228

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


R. P. SETHI, J.

( 1 ) TAKING cognizance of two news items published in the Times of India dated 11-1-1996 in its Bangalore Edition, a learned Judge of this Court initiated suo motu action directing the Registrar General to register his order of reference as Writ Petition and obtain appropriate orders from the Chief Justice for allocation of Court. In his order of reference, the learned Judge found that there was virtual break-down of law enforcement machinery which was found reflected because of the alleged rise of crime in the city of Bangalore.

( 2 ) VIDE Court order dated 29th May, 1996 notices were issued to the respondents. On 12th July, 1996 this Court felt that notice should also be issued to the Chairman of the Bar Council of Karnataka to assist the Court in adjudicating the powers, limitations and extent of this Court in exercise of Writ Jurisdiction in public interest litigation initiated suo motu. Notice was also issued to the Resident Editor of the Times of India, Bangalore.

( 3 ) IN his reply, the 5th respondent has submitted that the news items were published on the basis of the information collected by his Reporter. It is further submitted that the aforesaid news ite






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top