SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 247

RADHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.PADMANABHAN, P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON, Tarakaram Associates, V.S.VENKATESH

M. P. CHINNAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THE brief facts leading to this appeal are B. K. Sridhara Murthy was an employee in the Controllerate of Inspection Electronics, Ministry of Defence, Bangalore as chargeman Grade I. He died due to cardiac arrest on 3-9-1989 at Bangalore. The appellant is class I heir to the deceased B. K. Sridhara Murthy to claim the terminal benefits/assets left by her son B. K. Sridhara Murthy. She filed P. and S. C. 3/90 on the file of the 6th Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Metropolitan area, Bangalore City. She also arrayed Smt. S. Shylaja as 4th respondent as she claimed that she is the wife of the deceased and she is entitled for the share in terminal benefits and other assets of the deceased. Thereafter, the respondents 3 to 4 who are employees of the deceased have not seriously contested the petition. However, the 4th respondent filed objections and she also claimed that she is entitled for share in the assets of the deceased. The learned Judge after assessing the evidence adduced by both the parties, has come to the conclusion that the 4th respondent is the legally wedded wife of the deceased and therefore, she is also entitled to the family pension as the wi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top