SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 277

B.N.MALLIKARJUNA
N. RAMAPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
C. N. KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
M.B.PRABHAKAR, MOHANDAS N.HEADE

B. N. MALLIKARJUNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a tenant's revision under Sec. 50 (2) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short ). Addl. Small Causes Judge, Bangalore on March 21, 1992 while rejecting the claim of the landlord for eviction under Sec. 21 (1) (a) and (j) of the Act in HRC. No. 1897/86 directed the eviction of the tenant under Sec. 21 (1) (p) of the Act. This order is under challenge in this revision petition. This revision is filed on April 15, 1992 and it would appear that in the mean time on April 2, 1992 tenant N. Ramaprasad died and therefore this revision petition is filed along with the application I. A. I. under Order 22 Rule 4 R/w 151 C. P. C. with a prayer to bring the L. Rs. (4 sons) of the deceased revision-petitioner on record in place of the tenant. I would refer to the petitioner-landlord and respondent-tenant (deceased) as they were arrayed in the eviction petition, as landlord and tenant for the purpose of convenience.

( 2 ) THE landlord sought for eviction of the tenant from the premises bearing old No. 35 and new No. 85 situated in St. John's Church Road, Bangalore City bounded on the west by Netaji Road, South by St. Joh


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top