SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 316

R.P.SETHI, M.B.VISHWANATH
V. SHAFEEQUE AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.REDDY, Hasmanth Pasha

( 1 ) IN this writ petition (PIL) the petitioner had been convicted and was undergoing sentence of life imprisonment. The petitioner has since been released from the prison after completing his sentence.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has prayed that he and his co-prisoners, who fall within the following categories, should be directed to be released by means of an appropriate writ : (1) All convicted male prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for life even who are governed under Section 433-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and who have completed 10 years of sentence. (2) All convicted female prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for life, who have completed 8 years of sentence. (3) All convicted female prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for life, who are aged 65 years and above and who have completed 8 years of sentence. (4) All convicted prisoners who are either blind or suffering from deadly diseases like cancer, AIDS, etc, and who have been recommended to be released on medical advice and who have completed a sentence of 5 years of imprisonment.

( 3 ) FROM the nature of the prayers made, it is clear, the petitioner has prayed that the male prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for life sho











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top