SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 688

HARI NATH TILHARI
RATHNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
B. A. SRINIVASA GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.RAMA MURTHY, B.V.RAMMOHAN REDDY, S.P.SHANKAR

HARI NATH TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise from the judgment and order dated 13th of october, 1998 passed by XIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore on i. As. I and IV filed in O. S. No. 10169 of 1998, dismissing I. A. I filed by the plaintiff for temporary injunction and allowing I. A. IV filed by the defendants for vacating the ex parts injunction.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in a nutshell are: the present plaintiff-appellant had filed the suit for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their henchmen or their agents and servants from demolishing the temple of lord Eshwara as well as restraining them from putting up construction and from digging foundation as well as from changing the nature of the property etc. , till disposal of the suit. The plaintiff has stated that the property in dispute namely, Late muniswamappa Choultry or Maestry Mariyappa Choultry comprises in its fold a temple of Lord Eshwara alleged to be situated on the land measuring one and a half acres bearing old Sy. No. 109 and new Sy. No. 67 situated at 4th Cross, Subedar Chatram Road, R. K. Puram, Bangalore 560009, which came to be known as Muniswamappa Choultry and that was P
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top