SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 490

MOHAMED ANWAR
ANANTHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
COOPERATIVE SPINNING MILL LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.PRABHAKAR, R.A.Shiraguppi

MOHAMED ANWAR, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT is the widow of the deceased Ramulu, who has preferred this appeal against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation dated 14. 11. 1985 made in Case no. WCA/f-4/81-82 dismissing her application for grant of compensation under the workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('the act' for short ).

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that appellant's husband late Ramulu was employed and was working as a Reeler in the Spinning mill of respondent No. 1. On 8. 12. 1979 at 8. 45 a. m. when he was attending his work as such in the factory premises his co-worker Suresh s/o Bhaskar heard voice of the deceased saying 'ham'. Then, Suresh sensed the danger in the health condition of the deceased. Therefore, with the permission of the Incharge-Shift-Officer of respondent No. 1 factory, he took the deceased along with him to the city bus-stop at Hubli to take him to the hospital. While they were waiting for a bus at the said busstop the deceased once again gasped his breath saying 'ham' and collapsed there. Thereafter, appellant gave an application to the Commissioner for grant of compensation.

( 3 ) DURING enquiry, the statements of suresh and of the claimant were r






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top