SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 712

G.C.BHARUKA
BASAVARAJ NAGOOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K.Ramesh, S.VIJAYA SHANKAR, T.NARAYAN SVAMY, T.S.AMAR KUMAR

G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has appeared at the examination held on 30-8-1998 by Karnataka public service commission for the Karnataka civil service group 'a'/'b' post, the result whereof is still awaited. He has questioned the validity of Rule 3-b read with Rule 2 (1) (mm) of the Karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 (in short, the 'rules') which provide for giving of a weightage of 10% marks to the rural candidates in giving public employment under the state's civil services.

( 2 ) PURSUANT to the powers conferred on the state government under Section 3 of the Karnataka state civil services Act, 1978 (karnataka act 14 of 1990), the state government has made the Karnataka civil service (general recruitment) (forty-third amendment) rules, 1993, whereby it amended the rules by inserting clause (mm) in sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 defining 'rural candidate' and an independent Rule 3-b providing for 'weightage of marks to rural candidates' in order to give preference to them in public employment.

( 3 ) SUBSEQUENTLY, clause (mm) in sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 and Rule 3-b of the rules were subjected to various amendments by the Karnataka civil services (general recr



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top