SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 63

B.K.SANGALAD, KUMAR RAJARATNAM
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
BALAPPA – Respondent


KUMAR RAJARATNAM, J.

( 1 ) THE State being aggrieved by an order of acquittal recorded by the trial Court in S. C. No. 25/1990 in acquitting A-1 and A-2 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 304-B read with 34, IPC has presented this criminal appeal.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution was that deceased Amarawwa got married to A-2 Shivanand on 10-5-1987. The marriage took place in the house of A-1 Balappa. Deceased Amarawwa was sent to the house of A-2 after the marriage ceremony. A-1 is the father of A-2. A-1 the father and A-2 the husband of the deceased were living together.

( 3 ) PRIOR to the marriage there was an engagement agreement dated 28-4-1986. This engagement agreement was referred to as per custom as a settlement deed. The settlement deed is marked as Ex. P-1. According to the settlement deed, it was agreed that a sum of Rs. 2000/-, one tola gold and one wrist watch was given to the husband-A-2. A-1 the father was to give two sarees, one gold borimala sara and one pair of gold ear tops (Bandavali) to the deceased Amarawwa. Presumably both sides exchanged the gifts as mentioned in Ex. P-1. As stated earlier, the marriage of the deceased and A-2 took place on 10


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top