SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 175

CHIDANANDA ULLAL
LAWERENCE MENDONSA – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KUNDAPURA – Respondent


CHIDANANDA ULLAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against the order dated 27-5-1998 in c. dis. rev. sr. 1/87-88 passed by the respondent 1, the assistant commissioner, kundapura, copy at Annexure-B to writ petition, confirming the order of grant dated 15-6-1972 made by the respondent 3, the tahsildar, karkala, copy at Annexure-A to writ petition, order dated 12-1-1993 in case No. Rap. 83 of 1989-90 passed by the respondent 2, the special deputy commissioner in the second appeal, copy as at Annexure-C to writ petition. Confirming the order dated 7-8-1996 in rev. 43 of 1993 dismissing the revision petition of the petitioner and lastly the order dated 7-8-1996 in revision petition No. Rev. 43 of 1993, copy as at Annexure-D to writ petition, passed by the Karnataka appellate tribunal, the respondent 4 herein. Besides the petitioner had also challenged the original order dated 15-6-1972 in No. Dis. Fdr 709/71-72 passed by the respondent 3, the tahsildar, karkala, copy as at Annexure-A to writ petition.

( 2 ) I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri sanath kumar shetty, the learned counsel for the contesting respondent 5, Sri chandranath ariga and the learned additional gove

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top