CHIDANANDA ULLAL
LAWERENCE MENDONSA – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KUNDAPURA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against the order dated 27-5-1998 in c. dis. rev. sr. 1/87-88 passed by the respondent 1, the assistant commissioner, kundapura, copy at Annexure-B to writ petition, confirming the order of grant dated 15-6-1972 made by the respondent 3, the tahsildar, karkala, copy at Annexure-A to writ petition, order dated 12-1-1993 in case No. Rap. 83 of 1989-90 passed by the respondent 2, the special deputy commissioner in the second appeal, copy as at Annexure-C to writ petition. Confirming the order dated 7-8-1996 in rev. 43 of 1993 dismissing the revision petition of the petitioner and lastly the order dated 7-8-1996 in revision petition No. Rev. 43 of 1993, copy as at Annexure-D to writ petition, passed by the Karnataka appellate tribunal, the respondent 4 herein. Besides the petitioner had also challenged the original order dated 15-6-1972 in No. Dis. Fdr 709/71-72 passed by the respondent 3, the tahsildar, karkala, copy as at Annexure-A to writ petition.
( 2 ) I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri sanath kumar shetty, the learned counsel for the contesting respondent 5, Sri chandranath ariga and the learned additional gove
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.