SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 159

K.R.PRASADA RAO, ASHOK BHAN
B. K. CHANDRASHEKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ASHOK BHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of these two petitions filed as public interest litigation seeking the same relief though on different grounds to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Karnataka State Election Commission (for short, 'the Commission') to hold election to the Gram Panchayats in the State of Karnataka so that new elected body in each Panchayat is constituted well within time as mandated under Article 243-E of the Constitution of India irrespective of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Amendment Ordinance No. 1/99 (Ordinance) amending the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. In W. P. 3826/99 the vires of the ordinance have been challenged whereas in W. P. 3679/99 the vires of the ordinance have not been challenged.

( 2 ) ). In W. P. 3679/99 it has been averred that under Article 243e the duration of the Panchayat is five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and its duration cannot be extended any further. So also an election to constitute a Panchayat should be completed before the expiry of the said five year term and the responsibility of conducting such elections vests with the State Election Commission. The term of existing Panchayats is to expire































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top