SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 196

V.GOPALA GOWDA
S. N. VASUDEVAN – Appellant
Versus
MANAGEMENT OF BHARATH FRITZ WERNER (PRIVATE) LIMITED, BANGALORE – Respondent


V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners-workmen are aggrieved by the common award passed by the second respondent-Additional Labour Court in I. D. Nos. 205 to 212 of 1994, dated 5-11-1997, they have filed these writ petitions before this Court challenging the same urging various legal contentions.

( 2 ) THE workmen raised an industrial dispute by presenting their separate claim petitions under Section 10 (4-A) of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1988 (in short, 'the Act') challenging the action of the management in refusing employment to them during the month of May and June 1992, urging various legal contentions contending that, first respondent-management had appointed them. Prior to the appointment order dated 10-6-1991 copy of the appointment order vide Annexure-C they have worked as 'trainee machine Operators' in the first respondent-management for one year and thereafter they were appointed as Machine Operators in permanent posts on probation for six months. It is also further stated in the appointment orders issued to the petitioners similar to Annexure-C, after they were selected and appointed as Machine Operators, against the regular permanent






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top