SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 525

H.N.TILHARI
P. PRABHAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER – Respondent


HARI NATH TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition arises from the Judgment and Order dated 2. 7. 1996, passed by the II Additional Munsiff, Gulbarga, which has been confirmed by the Additional Civil Judge, Gulbarga, as appellate Court, by Judgment and Order dated 2. 8. 1996, whereby the Lower Appellate Court has dismissed the petitioner's appeal and affirmed the order of the Trial Court rejecting the petitioner's application I. A. I, for temporary injunction filed in O. S. No. 428/1995, whereby the petitioner had prayed for temporary injunction restraining the defendants respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession of the property in dispute and with the business in the name of Nandini Milk Parlour being run at Central Bus-Stand, ksrtc, Gulbarga, till the disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF claiming to be power of attorney holder of Nandini Milk Parlour at KSRTC Bus Stand, filed a suit for permanent injunction with the allegations to the effect that plaintiff is running nandini Milk Parlour at KSRTC Bus-stand, Gulbarga, since 18. 9. 1991, with the permission of Gulbarga Co-operative Milk Produqers federation Limited, Gulbarga, on terms and conditions and has b














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top