SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 353

MOHAMED ANWAR
LAKSHMI RAMAN MALU – Appellant
Versus
VENKATAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.H.SATISH, M.V.Raviprakash, N.SUBBA SHASTRY

MOHAMED ANWAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE revision petitions filed by the common petitioner against different respondents are taken up together for disposal as their decision rests on common question of law.

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein is common plaintiff in O. S. Nos. 126 to 130 of 1995 instituted in the Trial Court against respective respondents for the relief of injunction prohibiting them from alienating the respective items of suit properties or from creating encumbrance with respect thereto in favour of any third party. In the plaints it is averred that each of defendant 1 in the aforesaid suits, had executed the suit agreement for sale in plaintiffs favour in respect of his suit property. The suits are being contested by respective defendant 1 therein. It is an undisputed fact that temporary injunction in plaintiffs favour in each of the suit was also granted by the Trial Court, restraining defendants from effecting any transfer or alienation of the suit properties. Those suits were filed in 1995. Subsequently, in the year 1997, the suit properties were stated to have been, admittedly, acquired by the Government for KIADB (Karnataka industrial Area Development Board) for the formation o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top