KUMAR RAJARATNAM
K. CHANNAIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Mr. Jayakumar Patil, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Advocate General, the learned Counsel for the respondents.
( 2 ) ISSUE rule.
( 3 ) THE petitioners are not only members but also candidates for the election to the Committee of the Primary Co-operative Agriculture and rural Development Bank (2nd respondent ). The petitioners in this writ petition challenge the order of the Government, dated 15-3-2000 at Annexure-D and the Corrigendum dated 15-3-2000.
( 4 ) A notification at Annexure-D and a corrigendum of the same date was issued by the Government of Karnataka. A perusal of the English translation of the impugned notifications indicate that the Government had exercised powers under Section 30-B of the Karnataka Co-operative societies Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') to issue the impugned notifications.
( 5 ) IT would be appropriate at this stage to deal with Section 30-B of the Act (Karnataka State Act 13 of 2000 ). Section 30-B gives certain power to the State Government to issue certain directions in public interest from time to time to the Co-operative Societies and the societies are bound to comply with such di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.