SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 60

G.C.BHARUKA, MOHAMED ANWAR
PUTTANNA – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMANA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.PRABHAKARA REDDY

BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THE parents of one P. Nagarajaiah, who had died in a motor accident involving a lorry bearing No. CTK 9534 and a bicycle on 26-4-1991 on account of rash and negligent driving by the driver of lorry, have approached this Court for enhancement of compensation which has been quantified by the Tribunal at Rs. 75,000/ -.

( 2 ) THE Tribunal has found that the deceased was a bachelor at the time of accident and his parents were aged about 50 and 45 years respectively. Since there was no conclusive proof about the income of the deceased and the family had 8 acres 35 guntas of agricultural land, his services in agricultural operations and income from milk vending was assessed at Rs. 900/- per month. After deducting 1/3 for personal expenses, Rs. 600/- was taken as contribution to the family. Keeping in view average age of the parents of the deceased and the law laid by the Supreme Court in the cases of G. M. KERALA. S. R. T. C. v. SUSAMMA THOMAS, AIR 1994 SC 1631 and U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. v. TRILOK CHANDRA, (1996)4 SCC 362, the Tribunal has adopted the multiplier of 10' for estimating the loss of dependency, which was accordingly assessed at Rs. 72,000/- (600 x

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top