SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 54

KUMAR RAJARATNAM
GULLAMMA – Appellant
Versus
BASHEER SAB – Respondent


Advocates:
HARIKRISHNA S.HOLLA, Manjula R.Kamadolli, O.MAHESH

RAJARATNAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS M. F. A. is taken up for final disposal with the consent of parties.

( 2 ) ONE Chikkamarappa the deceased (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') died on 9. 12. 96 at 11. 45 a. m. The deceased was standing in front of the shop of one chowdappa near Bestamaranahalli on anekal-Rajamaranahalli Road, a Matador no. KA-02-4089 of the respondent No. 1 insured with the respondent No. 2 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the deceased as a result of which the deceased died on the spot. The appellant No. 1 is the mother of the deceased. The appellant No. 2 is the brother of the deceased.

( 3 ) THE Tribunal held that there was rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of Matador and came to the conclusion that the accident occurred as a result of rash and negligent driving of the vehicle that was insured with the respondent No. 2. I have no hesitation in affirming the finding of the Tribunal regarding the rash and negligent act of the driver.

( 4 ) WITH respect to the compensation, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 72,000 under the following heads: rs. 54,000 towards loss of dependency; rs. 10,000 towards the loss of love and affecti












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top