SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 149

H.N.TILHARI
FLORA MARGARET – Appellant
Versus
A. LAWRENCE – Respondent


Advocates:
A.R.Shakeel, K.SUBBA RAO

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs appeal directed against the judgment and decree dated 3-4-1997 given by X Additional City Civil Judge (Sri K. H. Malleshappa), Mayo Hall, Bangalore, in O. S. No. 10457 of 1992 (Smt. Flora Margaret v A. Lawrence) dismissing the plaintiffs suit.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in Nutshell are: that the plaintiff-appellant filed the above suit claiming decree for declaration declaring the release deed dated 29-11-1990 executed between the plaintiff and defendant to be null and void ab initio. The plaintiff further prayed for a decree in the nature of direction directing the defendant and other persons who are residing along with the defendant to vacate and handover vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff and on their failure to comply with the direction, this Hon'ble Court will be pleased to evict the defendant and others residing in the suit schedule property and handover the vacant possession to the plaintiff-appellant.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff as per the allegations in the plaint asserted that she is the absolute owner in possession with title and enjoyment of the immoveable property bearing No. 365 situated at Pillanna Gard


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top