SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 145

Karnataka High Court
Parvathamma - Appellant
Versus
C.Subramanyam - Respondent
Decided On : 02-22-00
MISC.FIRST : 3642 of 1998

Advocates:
B.M.SIDDAPPA, D.S.SRIDHAR

Subsequent wives in void marriages are not entitled to claim compensation as legal representatives under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - S. 166, Hindu Marriage Act - Ss. 5, 11, 16 - Legal representatives, Void marriage - [MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 - S. 166, HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 - Ss. 5, 11, 16]

Fact of the Case:

Deceased Boraiah died in a bus-lorry accident. His first wife and two daughters filed a claim petition seeking compensation. The court found the accident was due to the lorry driver's negligence and awarded compensation. The court also held that subsequent wives were not entitled to any part of the compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accident was due to the lorry driver's negligence and awarded compensation to the first wife and two daughters. It also held that subsequent wives were not entitled to any part of the compensation.

Issues: 1. Proof of accident and entitlement to claim compensation. 2. Entitlement of subsequent wives to claim compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The subsequent marriages being void, the subsequent wives could not be termed as legal representatives representing the estate of the deceased. Claim petitions for grant of compensation would not be maintainable on their behalf.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeals of the subsequent wives seeking enhancement of compensation and setting aside the finding that they were not entitled to any share of the compensation.

ASHOK BHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of MFA 3756/98 and MFA 3642/98 filed by two different claims arising from the same judgment and award dated 16-2-1998 in MVC No. 903/94 of the District Judge and MACT, Chitradurga, (for short, 'the Tribunal' ).

( 2 ) ). Facts :-Deceased Boraiah was the husband of Smt. Boramma-1 and father of Gowramma and Lakshmidevi. He was travelling in a KSRTC Bus bearing No. KA. 17 F-01 on 25th of May 1994 at about 9-45 p. m. from Chitradurga to Bharamasagar. The bus met with an accident : Near Laxmisagara the lorry bearing No. AP-03/t-1116 came from the opposite direction at high speed which was driven in a rash and negligent manner. The lorry dashed against the KSRTC Bus, resulting in the accident and causing grievous injuries to Boraiah; he was immediately taken to C. G. Hospital, Davanagere for treatment, where he died after 3 days i. e. , on 28-5-1994 at about 11-45 p. m. He died due to the injuries sustained by him in the accident. Boramma-1 and her two daughters filed the claim petition under S. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short, 'the Act') seeking compensation in respect of the death of Boraiah. He was 48 years of age at the time of accident and was working as line man in K. E. B. at Bharamasagara having an income of about Rs. 5,000/- per month. Subsequently Smt. Parvatamma, Smt. Boramma-2 and Smt. Chandramma who became claimants 4 to 6 were added in the claim petition by virtue of their impleading applications claiming that they too were the wives of deceased Boraiah.

( 3 ) IN the written statement filed by the 3rd respondent insurer, it was contended that the petitioners be put to strict proof of the averments made by them in their claim petition. That it was false to say that the accident occurred on account of any rash and negligent driving of the lorry by its driver. The Policy had been issued by the respondent subject to various terms, conditions and exceptions. The terms, conditions and exceptions of the policy be kept in mind while awarding compensation. Prayer was made that the petition be dismissed.

( 4 ) IN the counter filed by the 4th and the 5th respondents, it was contended that KSRTC is not responsible to pay any compensation to any of the claimants as the accident had taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the lorry. That the accident did not take place on account of the rash and negligent driving of the KSRTC Bus by its driver.

( 5 ) ON the basis of the above pleadings following issues were framed :1. Whether the petitioners prove that Boraiah S/o Chinnappa died due to injuries sustained in a KSRTC Bus and lorry accident which occurred on 25-5-1994 at about 9-40 p. m. on N. H. 4 between Beeravara and Laxmisagara gate, due to rash and negligent driving of the lorry bearing Reg. No. AP 03/t 1116 and the KSRTC bus bearing Reg. No. KA. 17/f-01 by the 1st respondent and the driver of the KSRTC Bus respectively?2. Whether the petitioners prove that they are the legal representatives of the deceased and are entitled to claim compensation amount?

( 6 ) ON evaluation of the evidence on record, the Tribunal found that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the lorry by its driver. Quantum of compensation was determined at Rs. 3,19,000/ -.

( 7 ) UNDER issue No. 2 it was held that Boramma-1 being the first wife and only legally wedded wife and the two daughters alone were entitled to the amount of compensation. The other three claimants who were allegedly the subsequent wives of the deceased were not entitled to any part of the compensation.

( 8 ) BORAMMA-1 and the two daughters filed MFA3769/98 seeking enhancement of compensation. A Division Bench of this Court accepted the appeal and enhanced the compensation to Rs. 4,29,000/ -. The rate of interest awarded by the Tribunal was affirmed.

( 9 ) PARVATAMMA and Boramma-2 have filed MFA Nos. 3756/98 and 3642/98 respectively claiming enhancement of compensation as well as for setting a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top