SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 195

ASHOK BHAN, V.G.SABHAHIT
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
SHIVANNA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.SEETHA RAMA RAO, G.B.MANJUNATH, K.T.MOHAN

BHAN, J.

( 1 ) UNITED India insurance co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the insurer') has come up in appeal against the judgment and award of the m. a. c. t. Ii, Mysore (for short, 'the tribunal') in m. v. c. No. 780 of 1992 dated 8. 7. 1998 with the plea that the insurer was not liable to pay the amount awarded as the driver of the offending vehicle did not have a valid licence to drive the said vehicle as on the date of the accident.

( 2 ) SHIVANNA, injured (hereinafter referred to as 'the claimant') was going on his m-50 mini motor cycle bearing registration No. Cna 231 on 15. 6. 1992 at about 6. 50 a. m. To attend to his duty at railway workshop, mysore. A lorry bearing No. Mym 6633 driven by barly prasad, respondent No. 1, came from the cross road without halting on the main road. It came from the wrong side and hit the claimant as a result of which he sustained several injuries including a head injury. He was taken to jss hospital for treatment. Thereafter, he was referred to nimhans, Bangalore. He filed the claim petition through his wife as the guardian stating therein that he had become a total mental and physical wreck. He had lost his earning capacity for future. Res














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top