SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 226

V.P.MOHAN KUMAR
PUTTATHAYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
E. S. I. CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates:
A.R.HOLLA, V.Narasimha Holla

V. P. MOHAN KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) AN employee died on November 3, 1981, according to the appellant due to an employment injury. Admittedly, he is covered by the benefits of the provisions of the employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 hereinafter referred to as the E. S. I. Act. Invoking Section 52 thereof the appellants claimed the benefits due to them. This application no doubt was made on January 10, 1994 with an application to condone the delay in domg so belatedly. It was the turn of the e. S. I. Corporation to contend that the claim is belated. The ESI Court accepted the defence and therefore rejected the same as belated. The appellant moved the High Court by filing m. F. A. 2735/1994 and this Court condoned the delay and directed the Court to re-entertain the claim and pass appropriate orders on merits of the case. The ESI Court has now held that the death of the worker was not due to any 'employment injury' and as such the legal heirs are not entitled to any benefit.

( 2 ) THE alleged employment injury which is the cause of the death of the employee is described as 'myocardial infarction'. It was in evidence that ever since 1977 the employee is victim 'of this sickness' and admitted











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top