V.P.MOHAN KUMAR
PUTTATHAYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
E. S. I. CORPORATION – Respondent
( 1 ) AN employee died on November 3, 1981, according to the appellant due to an employment injury. Admittedly, he is covered by the benefits of the provisions of the employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 hereinafter referred to as the E. S. I. Act. Invoking Section 52 thereof the appellants claimed the benefits due to them. This application no doubt was made on January 10, 1994 with an application to condone the delay in domg so belatedly. It was the turn of the e. S. I. Corporation to contend that the claim is belated. The ESI Court accepted the defence and therefore rejected the same as belated. The appellant moved the High Court by filing m. F. A. 2735/1994 and this Court condoned the delay and directed the Court to re-entertain the claim and pass appropriate orders on merits of the case. The ESI Court has now held that the death of the worker was not due to any 'employment injury' and as such the legal heirs are not entitled to any benefit.
( 2 ) THE alleged employment injury which is the cause of the death of the employee is described as 'myocardial infarction'. It was in evidence that ever since 1977 the employee is victim 'of this sickness' and admitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.