SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 251

H.N.TILHARI
S. RUDRAPPA – Appellant
Versus
PARVATHAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Gowhar Unnisa, Kalyan Basavaraj, M.Erappa Reddy, MUNIYAPPA

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendant's appeal from the judgment and decree dated 15-3-1997 delivered by Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, decreeing the plaintiffs claim for a sum of Rs. 1,05,590/- together with the costs and current interest at the rate of 18% per annum in O. S. No. 4739 of 1992. The plaintiffs case is that under an agreement for sale, the plaintiff had agreed to sell and the defendant had agreed to purchase the property belonging to the plaintiff, as mentioned in the plaint. That vide agreement dated 12-11-1987, entered between plaintiff and defendant, the defendant had agreed to purchase the properties mentioned in the plaint for a sum of Rs. 1,15,000/ -. That the defendant had paid advance sum of Rs. 10,000/- on the date of agreement and it was agreed the sale transaction will be completed within six months from the date of agreement after payment of balance sum of sale consideration. That the plaintiff acknowledged the receipt of the said amount. That as per plaint case, defendant on 16-11-1987 and on 17-2-1988 respectively paid sums of Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 15,000 and by two cheques dated 6-4-1988 for Rs. 12,000/- and dated 15-4-1988 for Rs. 48,000/-,















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top