SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 275

V.GOPALA GOWDA, V.BHASKARA RAO
V. S. PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
H. L. JAYANARASEMHA – Respondent


Advocates:
ABDUL KHADER, G.S.VISHVESHVARA, UDAYA HOLLA

Y. BHASKAR RAO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS contempt petition is filed alleging that the first respondent had wilfully disobeyed the order passed by this court in m. f. a. No. 2883 of 1997, dated 26-8-1997 directing him not to sell or alienate or in any way encumber the schedule property.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that complainant filed a suit o. s. No. 1223 of 1997 on the file of the. City civil court, Bangalore for recovery of an amount of Rs. 8. 42 lakhs. In the suit he sought for attachment before the judgment of the schedule property, on the ground that the first respondent is trying to sell the schedule property. The first respondent made an averment that he is not intending to sell the schedule property. The trial court rejected the application filed for attachment. Against the said order the complainant filed an appeal m. f. a. No. 2883 of 1997 in this court. This court after satisfying that there is a prima facie case on merits passed an order dated 26-8-1997 directing the first respondent herein not to sell or alienate or in any way encumber the schedule property. Later, the first respondent filed a memo in the appeal stating therein that he has no capacity either to pro




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top