SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 323

M.F.SALDANHA
J. S. SATHYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, MADIKERI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.BHAWANI SINGH, PRABHAKAR L.SHETTY, S.G.BHAGAWAN

M. F. SALDANHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals have been preferred by the original accused 1 and 2 in special case (corruption) No. 1 of 1993 decided by the learned principal sessions judge, kodagu, district madikeri on 7-10-1995.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the accused 1 who was then the chief officer of the town municipal council, madikeri and accused 2 who was then a clerk working under accused 1 were alleged to have demanded and received illegal gratification of Rs. 500/- each from P. W. 1-raghavendra holla for purposes of showing favour to him in relation to an application that had been filed pertaining to a certain property. It is unnecessary for me to embark upon a detailed narration of the prosecution case because it was alleged that the complaint was registered by the madikeri lokayukta police on 2-8-1991 and that pursuant to this complaint a trap was laid. the complainant was asked to handover the ten currency notes of rs. 100/- denomination which had been treated with phenolphthalein powder and to give a signal to the party. On the date of the incident, the complainant handed over the amounts in two envelopes, one to the accused 1 who is alleged to have kept the same on his table a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top