SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 424

MOHAMED ANWAR
K. P. PONNAPPA – Appellant
Versus
K. P. POOVAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
J.PRAKASH, S.N.PRABANTHA CHANDRA

MOHAMED ANWAR, J.

( 1 ) HEARD both sides.

( 2 ) THIS is plaintiffs' petition directed against the Trial Court's order dated 27-10-1999 made in O. S. No. 58 of 1994 directing him to file a fresh valuation slip by correctly valuing the relief claimed in the plaint to the extent of their share in the suit schedule Item Nos. 7 to 14 valuing the extent of their and also liability in O. S. No. 139 of 1987 based on the extent of their share, and further directing them to pay the Court fee in proportion to the one which was paid by dependent No. 5 in O. S. No. 139 of 1987.

( 3 ) THE suit in O. S. No. 58 of 1994 was instituted by the petitioners-plaintiffs against respondents-defendants 1 to 4, for partition and separate possession of their share in the suit schedule immovable properties described at Items 1 to 14 therein. Respondent 5-Vijaya Bank was made defendant 5 in the suit pleading at para 11 of the plaint that the Bank by instituting suit in O. S. No. 139 of 1987 against the parents and uncles of plaintiffs, obtained a money decree towards recovery of the loan that was said to have been borrowed by mortgaging the immovable properties at Items 7 to 14 of the present suit and that the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top