SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 409

G.PATRI BASAVANA GOUD
KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK B.HINCHIGIRI, N.V.PRAKASH

PATRI BASAVANA GOUD, J.

( 1 ) M/s. Sun Crush Fruits (P) Limited (hereinafter to be called 'assessee') is due in a sum of Rs. 2,16,756 by way of arrears of sales tax for the year 1991-1992. The respondent-Assistant commissioner of Commercial Taxes initiated a proceeding before the learned special JMFC (sales Tax), Bangalore at Criminal Misc. No. 1057/96 for recovery of the said sum under Section 13 (3) (b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 ('kst Act' for short ). The learned magistrate issued fine levy warrant for recovery of the said amount under Section 421 (1) (a) Cr. P. C. by attachment and sale of the movable property of the assessee. The said movable property sought to be attached and sold was the plant and Machinery. But the said plant and machinery, by then, has already been mortgaged and hypothecated in favour of the Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Limited, Bangalore ('ksiidc' for short ). The said KSIIDC is a financial corporation established under Section 3 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 ('sfc Act' for short ). The assessee is stated to be owing to the KSIIDC in respect of the loan for which it has mortgaged/hypothecated






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top