SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 504

H.L.DATTU
C. T. MANJUNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.T.NANAIAH, S.SHEKHAR SHETTY, UDAYASHANKAR

H. L. DATTU, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of india, petitioner-dr. C. t. manjunath, a resident of chikmagalur town seeks payment of Rs. 25,00,000/- (rupees twenty-five lakhs only) towards compensation for alleged violation of his fundamental rights by respondent-police authorities by arresting him on 2-7-1995, and detaining him in the police and judicial custody till 24-8-1995 and thereafter, filing a charge-sheet before the jurisdictional magistrate, for offences punishable under sections 302, 202 and 404 of the Indian Penal Code. The other incidental relief sought in the petition is to direct the state government to frame guidelines for registering and investigating cases by the police authorities by incorporating safeguards in favour of the citizens and further laying down "principles of accountability" against police officers, who wantonly and deliberately abuse their police powers.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is a qualified medical practitioner, having his private clinic at chikmagalur town. He was the accused in a criminal case filed before the chief judicial magistrate, chikmagalur, by the respondent police officers. First respondent is the stat





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top