SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 534

K.SREEDHAR RAO, T.S.THAKUR
MODINSAHEB PEERSAHEB PEERZADE – Appellant
Versus
MEERABI – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S.RAMACHANDRA REDDY, K.GIRIDHAR, M.B.PRABHAKAR

K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed in O. S. No. 100 of 1989 on the file of the learned Civil Judge, Jamakhandi.

( 2 ) DEFENDANTS 1 to 5 and 8 to 10 in the suit are the appellants. The plaintiff and defendants 6 and 7 are respondents in the appeal. Appellants 1 to 3 are the brothers of the first and fourth respondents. The 5th appellant is the aunt of the first respondent and appellants 1 to 3. Respondents 2 and 3 are the alienees of the 5th appellant. Appellants 6 to 8 are the alienees of the second appellant.

( 3 ) ONE Kasimsaheb and Peersaheb are the full brothers. Kasimsaheb died on 13-11-1968 leaving behind his widow-the 5th appellant. Peersaheb died on 25-9-1987 leaving behind appellants 1 to 4 and the first respondent who are his children. 'a' schedule properties are agricultural lands situated at Kokatanur Village in Athani Taluk, 'b' schedule properties are agricultural lands situated at Tungal Village in Jamkhandi taluk, 'c' schedule properties are the house properties situated at Tungal village in Jamkhandi Taluk and 'd' schedule properties are the movable like tractor, pumpset, gold and silver ornaments and agriculture i


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top