MOHAMED ANWAR
SHAKUNTALA – Appellant
Versus
VIRUPANNA S – Respondent
( 2 ) ON 31-12-1999, after her plea was recorded, the petitioner being a widow and a permanent resident of Bangalore City, an application under Section 205, Cr. P. C. on her behalf was filed praying that the learned Magistrate may be pleased to exempt her from personal attendance at the trial in the case, on the ground that as a woman accused from Bangalore she had to experience a lot of difficulty and hardship in attending the trial Court on all the dates of hearing. That application has been rejected by the learned Magistrate by his order dated 19-10-2000 on the ground that Non Bailable Warrant had to be issued against her to secure her attendance on the previous dates of hearing. Aggrieved by that order, she has approached this Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.